preloader

Jurisprudence

🇨🇲Camerún
Ohadata J-13-216
Suit n° HCB/08S/12 High Court of Mezam Décision du 01/06/2012

Measures Of Execution - Application For Diversion - Nullity Of Mortgage - Validity Of Mortgage - Attachment - Administration Of Estate - Letters Of Administration - Co-ownership - Alienation - Trustees - Powers Of Administrator - Personal Estate - Indivisibility Of Property - Conditions For Mortgage - Specifications - Observations And Declarations - Eventual Hearing - Family Property - Security - Capacity To Mortgage - Distribution Of Property - Interest Of Beneficiaries - Personal Representatives - Dismissal Of Application - Order Of Sale

The court had to rule on an application for diversion of attached property based on the nullity of its mortgage. To arrive at its decision, the court had to determine the validity of the mortgage deed by a single co-owner and the possibility of attachment of the mortgaged property. Section 121 of the 1997 Uniform Act Organising Securities provides that persons whose rights over property are subject to duly notified conditions, cancellation or rescission, may only grant a mortgage on the property subject to the same conditions, cancellation or rescission. However, mortgages granted by all the co-owners of joint property shall remain effective regardless of the outcome of any subsequent sale by auction or sharing of the property. Though the 1997 Uniform Act did not address the question of mortgage of indivisible property by one single co-owner, the position is that a single co-owner can mortgage joint property but the interest of all the beneficiaries must be taken into consideration thus, the mortgage is valid.

Concerning the possibility of attachment of the mortgaged joint property, section 249 of the Uniform Act Organising Simplified Recovery Procedures and Measures of Execution stipulates that the indivisible part of real property may not be put up for sale before the sharing or liquidation that may be prompted by the creditors of a co-owner. Hence, the property can be attached but cannot be sold before distribution. The application for diversion was, therefore, dismissed.

Sections 15, 117, 121 And 127 Uas 1997,
Sections 194 And 227 Uas 2010,
Sections 249, 308, 309, 310 And 311 Uasrpme

Actualité récente

Convocatoria de comunicacion: Inteligencia artificial y África

La Escuela Regional Superior de la Magistratura (ERSUMA) de la Organización para la Armonización en África del Derecho de los Negocios (OHADA), organiza del 22 al 25 de octubre de 2025 en Cotonú (Benín), un coloquio internacional sobre el tema “La inteligencia artificial y África: miradas cruzadas de juristas, politólogos, economistas y sociólogos”.

Seminario sobre el derecho de los negocios en la Universidad de Buea, el derecho OHADA al centro de los debates

Este seminario, organizado por el departamento del derecho de los negocios de la Facultad de derecho y ciencia política de esta Universidad, se ha enriquecido con cinco comunicaciones. Como apertura de telón del evento, el Doctor Alexis NDZUENKEU, dirigiendo la delegación de la OHADA, ha mantenido intercambio de opiniones en idioma inglés con los participantes sobre el tema: “la OHADA y sus Instituciones como garantía del crecimiento económico en África”.