preloader

Jurisprudence

🇨🇲Cameroon
Ohadata J-13-215
Suit n° HCB/3S/05-06, Union Bank of Cameroon Plc c/ Protion Livestock and ATONGFAC Elias. High Court of Mezam Décision du 12/06/2012

Security - Mortgage Deed - Parties To A Mortgage - Mortgagor - Dual Contract - Nullity Of Mortgage - Measures Of Execution - Attachment Of Property - Specifications - Contingent Hearing - Declarations And Observations - Guarantor - Personal Guarantee - Indivisibility Of Debtor And Guarantor - Registration Of Company - Legal Status - Juristic Personality - Corporate Status - Executory Formula - Unfounded Declarations - Sale Of Mortgaged Property

Here the court had to decide on the objection against the attachment for sale of the property of ATONGFAC Elias in satisfaction of the creditor. In order to reach its decision, the court had other fundamental issues to grapple with. It had to determine whether the purported debtor and the guarantor were the same or different persons. In order to do so, it had to rule on the legal status of PROLICOM, the purported debtor. The court also had to rule on the validity of the mortgage deed.

Section 46 of the Uniform Act on General Commercial Law states that companies and other corporate bodies referred to in the Uniform Act on Commercial Companies and Ecomomic Interest Groups (UACCEIG) shall apply for registration in the Trade and Personal Property Credit Register (TPPCR), within a month of their creation, to the registry of the court within whose jurisdiction their registered office is located. By virtue of section 98 of UACCEIG, unless otherwise provided by the Uniform Act, all companies shall have a legal personality with effect from the date of registration in the TPPCR. An unregistered business as was the case of PROLICOM is not separate from the owner and so the debtor and the guarantor were the same person.

On the validity of the mortgage deed, the bone of contention was whether the introduction of the third party - borrower/guarantor rendered the deed null. It is a well-known principle of law that there is no nullity without text or that nullity is not presumed. Though a mortgage deed is a dual contract between either the borrower and the lender or the borrower and the guarantor, the introduction of the third party did not offend any section of the law on mortgages, thus the mortgage deed was valid.

As to the objection against the attachment of the property of ATONGFAC Elias, section 127 of the 1997 Uniform Act Organising Securities provides that a contractual mortgage may be granted only by a person who has duly registered rights over the real property and is entitled to dispose of it. An unregistered company lacks a legal personality and cannot own property. In case of any enforcement measure in view of settling a debt contracted for the purpose of the business, the property of its owner can be attached.

Section 9 Ohada Treaty,
Sections 44 And 46 Uagcl,
Sections 98, 854 And 864 Uacceig,
Sections 1, 2 And 127 Uas 1997,
Section 227 Uas 2010,
Sections 170 And 272 Uasrpme

Actualité récente

affiche

7e édition de la Semaine OHADA : Formations préparatoires au Concours national de plaidoirie, du 12 au 18 mai 2026 à Abidjan

Ces séances ont pour objet de préparer la participation de l'Université Nord-Sud à la 7e édition de la Semaine OHADA et visent à permettre aux participants de consolider leurs acquis, de renforcer leur maîtrise de la méthodologie juridique, et de se familiariser avec les exigences relatives à l'exercice de la plaidoirie.

photo1

Journée scientifique sur le droit OHADA, Mbuji-Mayi (Kasaï Oriental, RDC), 28 février 2026

Le 28 février 2026, il s'est tenu, à Mbuji-Mayi, Chef-lieu de la Province du Kasai-Oriental en République Démocratique du Congo, dans la salle Marie-Agnès, une journée scientifique organisée par le cabinet d'avocats RMK et Associés, à l'occasion du deuxième anniversaire de l'entrée en vigueur de l'Acte uniforme portant organisation des procédures simplifiées de recouvrement et des voies d'exécution, sous le thème général : « Les questions pratiques du recouvrement des créances, résultant du nouvel Acte uniforme portant organisation des procédures simplifiées de recouvrement et des voies d'exécution (AUPSRVE) ».

Séminaire de formation sur le contentieux OHADA devant la CCJA, du 7 au 9 avril 2026 à Lomé (Togo)

Thème : « Le Contentieux OHADA devant la Cour Commune de Justice et d'Arbitrage (CCJA) : les récentes évolutions (2024-2025) de la jurisprudence de la CCJA en matière d'interprétation et d'application des Actes uniformes ». Date et lieu : 7 au 9 avril 2026 au Centre d'affaires KESORE de Lomé (TOGO). Participation en présentiel ou en distanciel (ligne).